A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals.

نویسندگان

  • P J Devereaux
  • Peter T L Choi
  • Christina Lacchetti
  • Bruce Weaver
  • Holger J Schünemann
  • Ted Haines
  • John N Lavis
  • Brydon J B Grant
  • David R S Haslam
  • Mohit Bhandari
  • Terrence Sullivan
  • Deborah J Cook
  • Stephen D Walter
  • Maureen Meade
  • Humaira Khan
  • Neera Bhatnagar
  • Gordon H Guyatt
چکیده

BACKGROUND Canadians are engaged in an intense debate about the relative merits of private for-profit versus private not-for-profit health care delivery. To inform this debate, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the mortality rates of private for-profit hospitals and those of private not-for-profit hospitals. METHODS We identified studies through an electronic search of 11 bibliographical databases, our own files, consultation with experts, reference lists, PubMed and SciSearch. We masked the study results before determining study eligibility. Our eligibility criteria included observational studies or randomized controlled trials that compared private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. We excluded studies that evaluated mortality rates in hospitals with a particular profit status that subsequently converted to the other profit status. For each study, we calculated a relative risk of mortality for private for-profit hospitals relative to private not-for-profit hospitals and pooled the studies of adult populations that included adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., teaching status, severity of illness) using a random effects model. RESULTS Fifteen observational studies, involving more than 26 000 hospitals and 38 million patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In the studies of adult populations, with adjustment for potential confounders, private for-profit hospitals were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk [RR] 1.020, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.038; p = 0.02). The one perinatal study with adjustment for potential confounders also showed an increased risk of death in private for-profit hospitals (RR 1.095, 95% CI 1.050-1.141; p < 0.0001). INTERPRETATION Our meta-analysis suggests that private for-profit ownership of hospitals, in comparison with private not-for-profit ownership, results in a higher risk of death for patients.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND It has been shown that patients cared for at private for-profit hospitals have higher risk-adjusted mortality rates than those cared for at private not-for-profit hospitals. Uncertainty remains, however, about the economic implications of these forms of health care delivery. Since some policy-makers might still consider for-profit health care if expenditure savings were sufficiently ...

متن کامل

Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE Financial incentives may encourage private for-profit providers to perform more caesarean section (CS) than non-profit hospitals. We therefore sought to determine the association of for-profit status of hospital and odds of CS. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the first year of records thr...

متن کامل

Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

CONTEXT Private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis facilities provide the majority of hemodialysis care in the United States. There has been extensive debate about whether the profit status of these facilities influences patient mortality. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a difference in adjusted mortality rates exists between hemodialysis patients receiving care in private for-prof...

متن کامل

Meta-analysis (systematic review) of profit management antecedents and explaining the effect of company size adjuster

The purpose of the present study is to meta-analyze (systematic review) of profit management antecedents and explain the moderating effect of company size. The statistical population of the article is 100 articles and dissertations published during the years 1387 to 1398. Based on the research method, 48 studies were reviewed as the final sample. The present study was done by meta-analysis usin...

متن کامل

Unnecessary hospital admissions in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Unnecessary patient admission to a hospital refers to the hospitalization of a patient without clinical indications and criteria. Various factors related to the patient (e.g., age, disease severity, payment method, and admission route and time), the physician and the hospital and its facilities and diagnostic technologies affect a patient unnecessary admission in a hospital. Unneces...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

دوره 166 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002